QUAINT??
TRANSPARENT GOVERNMENT??

LACK OF TRANSPARENCY IN CRANFORD
PRIVATE MEETINGS/HIDDEN AGENDA BY DMC, PLANNING BOARD AND MAYOR HANNEN
REDEVELOPMENT OF OUR DOWNTOWN
WHAT HAPPENED TO "QUAINT"?
read in Westfield Leader
page 1
page 2
WHAT ARE THEY HIDING?
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT STUDY NEEDS TO BE ON TOWN WEBSITE NOW WHERE THE TAXPAYERS CAN SEE WHAT THEY PAID FOR AND WHAT IS BEING PLANNED

CONTACT COMMISSIONERS

Township Committee Meetings
December 18 & 19

ZONING/PLANNING BOARD HEARINGS

750 WALNUT AVENUE/HARTZ MOUNTAIN

COURT DENIES CRANFORD'S REQUEST TO CHANGE AFFORDABLE HOUSING JUDGMENT--Westfield Leader, October 5, 2017


ADJOURNED BY APPLICANT REQUEST--750 WALNUT PLANNING BOARD MEETING --NEW DATE TO BE ANNOUNCED

click here: HOW A NJ PLANNING BOARD WORKS AND HOW TO PARTICIPATE

CLICK HERE TO REVIEW THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN, SITE PLAN AND TRAFFIC PLAN FOR THE 905 APT PROPOSAL FOR 750 WALNUT AVE.
Rumored Morale Problems Plague the Cranford Municipal Building
Within the last 6 months a number of Cranford employees have quit. A few examples:
Police Chief
Assistant Zoning Officer
Township Clerk
Tax Collector

TAX REVENUE?

“Other mayors, including Scott Rumana of Wayne, reject the idea that exclusionary zoning saves money, because having more senior citizens pushes up emergency response costs. Most seniors who move stay in the same towns, according to data from AARP. They usually sell the homes in which they raised their families to homebuyers with children, negating any tax benefit. And seniors have expenses of their own, Rumana said.” Vasectomy Housing Surges as New Jersey Tax Remedy, Jan. 17, 2007, by Bob Ivry, Bloomberg.com.

“Reliance on the property tax not only results in big property tax bills for individual homeowners, it also creates broader incentives that have powerful, distorting effects on land-use decisions. From a fiscal perspective, residential development generally does not “pay for itself”—that is, the cost of the services demanded by residents generally exceeds the tax revenue generated by residential property—whereas nonresidential property generally costs less to service than it generates in revenue. Thus every municipality has an incentive to court nonresidential development—shopping centers, office parks, hotels—while discouraging residential development, thereby keeping costs low relative to revenues. This is the infamous “ratables chase.” Further because public school funding is by far the largest component of local government expenditures, municipalities endeavor to control costs by excluding children, favoring senior housing complexes, and ..." Property Tax Reform & Land Use, Smart Growth Recommendations from New Jersey Future, Issue 14, July 2006.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EFFECTIVE PROPERTY TAX REFORM

“Particular attention should be paid to solutions that minimize municipal competition for tax revenues, since that competition is the direct cause of many unwanted land-use effects. Such solutions include: shared services, tax-base sharing, increased state aid to municipalities, particularly for education.” Property Tax Reform & Land Use, Smart Growth Recommendations from New Jersey Future, Issue 14, July 2006.