THERE IS NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST
REPORT FINDS NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOR LAWYER REPRESENTING CRANFORD IN BIRCHWOOD,
Cranford Chronicle, June 17, 2013
click here to read the Opinion of Professor Ambrosio about the alleged conflict of interest by Mr. Morin

The ordinance below is for a study of a different form of government for Cranford. The link explaining the different forms is included. Please contact the Township Commissioners as to whether or not you would like the voters to decide if Cranford should form a commission to study the possibility of a new form of government for Cranford.
Ordinance No. 2013-14: AN ORDINANCE RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO.
2012-38 THAT PROVIDED FOR A REFERENDUM TO VOTERS TO ALLOW
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CHARTER STUDY COMMISSION
click here to read about DIFFERENT FORMS OF NJ MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT
CONTACT TOWNSHIP COMMISSIONERS

RESIDENTS IN CRANFORD NOT PLEASED WITH WESTFIELD, LOCAL SOURCE, JUNE 14, 2013
CRANFORD RESIDENTS OBJECT TO WF'S SUNNYSIDE DEVELOPMENT, WESTFIELD LEADER, MAY 9. 2013


WHO'S WHO IN CRANFORD DEVELOPMENT

WHAT IS A BUILDER'S REMEDY LAWSUIT?

A “Builder’s Remedy Lawsuit” is simply legal action taken by a property developer in an attempt to force a municipality to permit construction of a large, multi-family housing structure or complex.

Typically, the developer’s court brief will make specific mention of the Mt. Laurel decision, a landmark case that holds municipalities responsible for providing affordable housing to low and moderate income households.

Many local officials believe that “Builder’s Remedy Lawsuits” are used by developers to force the construction of unneeded housing under the guise of providing affordable housing for those that need it most, when in reality they are only interested in building large quantities of market rate homes for profit.

By filing an affordable housing plan with the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH), the State of NJ office responsible for determining affordable housing requirements, municipalities can protect themselves against “Builder's Remedy Lawsuits.”

Cranford did not file an affordable housing plan (see stories below on no coah certification)with the Council on Affordable Housing and, therefore, left the town wide open to builder's remedy lawsuits. One such lawsuit was settled on 555 South Avenue for 163 Apartments and the other was just approved by a Judge for 360 apartments and a parking garage on Birchwood Avenue. The town plans on appealing the Birchwood Avenue decision.

Commissioners Voted "No" to Affordable Housing (COAH) Certification

Cranford Has No Affordable Housing Plan