CRANFORD TAKES ANOTHER LOOK AT CHANGING THEIR GOVERNMENT
The Local
Source
By: Cheryl Hehl - Staff
Writer
CRANFORD
— If the township is going to make a move towards changing its current form of
government, residents will have to make their voices heard on the issue or
forever hold their peace.
Last
week Mayor Tom Hannen said the township will be repealing a 2012 ordinance
approved late last year that would have paved the way for a charter commission
to investigate changing the current form of government.
Although
the ordinance is scheduled to be repealed at the June 11 township committee
meeting, Hannen said the issue is far from dead.
“In order to move forward we have to repeal the old ordinance that allowed us to establish a charter commission,” the mayor explained, adding that by doing this he hoped residents would come forward to say how they feel about the issue one way or another. Right now even he is on the fence.
“I’m
not sure what to do. This is about Cranford’s future and how residents will be
governed, not just about the present,” Hannen said, suggesting whatever the
township decides should be based on input from residents.
“I
hope repealing the old ordinance brings out residents so we can hear how they
feel about this,” he said, pointing out that the governing body needs to know
how people really feel about the current form of government and if a change is
something they want.
But
that is not the only problem facing Hannen. Two minority Republican members on
the committee are strongly in favor of a charter study and the mayor said he
cannot ignore their concerns.
Last
year the Republican majority on the committee introduced the ordinance late in
the year, but later the matter was shelved. Support further weakened when the
Democrats took over control of the township committee Jan. 1, but Hannen said
the timing was just “all off.”
“It was late in the year when it was brought up, right around the holidays when most people are busy. Now we have had the ability to think about it clearly and the timing is better,” the mayor said.
“It was late in the year when it was brought up, right around the holidays when most people are busy. Now we have had the ability to think about it clearly and the timing is better,” the mayor said.
At
the time, former mayor David Robinson, Lisa Adubato and Andy Kalnins supported the
measure while Democrats Kevin Campbell and Edward O’Malley did not. At a recent
meeting Campbell was still against changing the township committee form of
government, telling fellow committee members he did not see it as a “cure-all”
for the problems facing the township.
“I
haven’t heard anyone express any real support for a charter study or for
changing our form of government,” he said, adding that only two people actually
commented on the issue in the past. O’Malley saw things from a different
perspective.
“I
don’t see this as a public support issue. I see it as effective government and
effective access,” he said, mentioning it was not “effective” to keep bringing
up the subject every five or six years.
Hannen
is keeping an open mind but did feel bringing aboard an experienced, full-time
administrator changed the picture considerably from last year when the township
was in a state of flux.
“Having
Joe Hartnett has been a blessing. He is on top of everything and has everything
under control, which is a big change from last year,” the mayor said mentioning
that he believed a lack of long-range planning caused the problems the township
experienced in the past.
“We need to plan three years ahead, not one,” Hannen said, explaining the township is a business “and businesses plan ahead more than a year.”
On the other hand, while Adubato admitted the addition of a full time administrator certainly resulted in improvements, she felt there was no harm in asking residents how they felt. Specifically she pointed to how inconsistencies from year-to-year resulted in the township getting mired in situations like Birchwood.Birchwood is a builder’s remedy apartment complex development on Birchwood Avenue that the township and residents living adjacent to the proposed project have been against since its inception. As a result the township incurred well over a half million in legal costs to fight the project, a number that some officials say is more “like a million.”
The
question of changing the form of government in Cranford is not a new one.
Periodically the issue has surfaced and then gone off the radar again.
In
fact, in 2007 when the matter was brought before voters in a referendum, 75
percent were in favor of a change. Records indicated there was unusual turnout
when the issue came up on the ballot, considering it was not a federal or
gubernatorial election, with 3,611 residents in favor of changing the form of
government and 1,984 against.
This
all changed the following summer after a nine-member Charter Study Advisory Committee
spent months investigating whether a change in government was in order. In
August 2008 this committee recommended keeping the current township committee
form of government, suggesting the administrator’s role be extended to increase
efficiency.
Although
the community came out in force to support a change in government, when it came
time for the advisory committee to hold a public hearing on the issue, only a
handful of residents attended and the township only received six emails on the
topic.
Currently
the township operates a committee form of government with five members elected
at large for three-year terms. Although there is a mayor, the position is not
elected at large, but rather decided by the majority members on the committee,
as is the deputy mayor position.
There
are four forms of government municipalities can choose from under The Faulkner
Act, a 1923 state law that permitted towns to choose between four types of
government.
The
township form, like Cranford, is the oldest form of municipal government in New
Jersey.
Following that is the town form with the mayor and councilman selected in partisan, not political, elections.
There
also is a city form of government with an elected mayor and council, like
Rahway and Linden, and the borough form, which is the most popular form of
local government in the state where the mayor is elected to a four-year term.
Springfield
is a year into the process of investigating whether to switch to one of the
three other forms of government, with a referendum expected to be on the ballot
in the November election.
A
charter committee appointed in January consisting of five members is currently
looking into all options and is expected to render a decision by August. Like
Cranford, this is not the first time the issue surfaced.
In
Springfield in 1958, a charter committee looked at other forms of municipal
government and made recommendations but nothing came of it.
In
1996, the issue again came up and a Springfield Government Study Committee
looked into how the township government was organized and the processes it used
but again, nothing came of this venture. This past November voters approved a
referendum by a 170-vote margin, with the vote tally coming in 2,391 to 2,221
in favor of looking further into a change. Even though political power on the
committee switched from Republican to Democrat, the measure did not die in the
process. A charter committee was formed to look into the matter and is expected
to return with a report by August.
According
to a report by the charter group, it will look into several issues, including
studying the present form of government by interviewing both present and past
governing body members, civic leaders and media representatives. The group also
will hold public meetings to inform voters of other forms of government prior
to preparing a report with a final decision on the matter.
The
charter group said after digesting this information they will decide whether to
retain the current form of government, retain it with modifications, suggest
changing to one of the three other forms of town government, or petition the
legislature for a special charter, which could include amendments to the
present town charter.