We are a group of involved residents from the Cranford community who have come together for one reason — to be better informed about the decisions being made that affect the future of our town. This site is available for Cranford citizens as a reference relating to Cranford development. We do not support the solicitation of money nor are affiliated with any political party or candidate for elected office.
Frank Krause in his letter to the Westfield Leader ON 3/1 (link below) expresses his frustration about the lack of public input and discourse at the DMC Strategic Plan one-sided presentation. Residents were asked to place dots on DMC ideas to express themselves. Just the continuance of the lack of transparency, accountability and citizen input with the present Cranford Township administration.
Rumored Morale Problems Plague the Cranford Municipal Building
Within the last 6 months a number of Cranford employees have quit. A few examples:
Downtown Business & Economic Development Director
Assistant Zoning Officer
Traffic Expert Testify During Day One of Birchwood Hearing
by Toniann Antonelli The Cranford Patch August 9, 2012
A group of at least 25
Cranford residents crowded into a room at the Union County Courthouse in
Elizabeth Wednesday for day one of a site plan hearing for the proposed
Birchwood development plan, which calls for 360 apartment units to be
constructed in a flood-prone area of Birchwood Avenue.
A handful of residents -
some of whom were part of community group known as the Concerned Citizens of Cranford,
met in the Parking lot of the Orange Avenue Pool about an hour before the
planned 10 a.m. start time. The small group, along with Deputy Mayor Andis
Kalnins, boarded a yellow school bus provided by the township to transport
residents to and from the courthouse.
Local officials and
residents objected to the hearing being held in Elizabeth as opposed to taking
place in the Cranford Municipal Building. Residents worried that many people
would either be working, on summer vacation or unable to travel to Elizabeth to
be present for the hearing. Despite the objections, however, Special Hearing
Officer Douglas K. Wolfson - a retired Superior Court Judge appointed to
preside over the site plan hearing - maintained that the hearing was part of
ongoing legal proceedings, not a typical Planning Board matter. As such, it was
more appropriate to conduct the hearing in Superior Court.
"This is a judicial
proceeding. This is not a planning board meeting in town hall," Wolfson
In the days preceding the
hearings, Wolfson said he and Special Master Elizabeth McKenzie received
several letters from residents objecting to the courthouse as a venue.
Township Attorney Phil
Morin also raised objections that the notification for the hearing only made
mention of day one of the case, when in fact, the hearing is scheduled to
continue for two days. Stephen Eisdorfer, the attorney for Cranford Development
Associates, an LLC for the S. Hekemian group which owns the property, stated
that the law only requires notification for the first day of the hearing. The
hearing itself, scheduled to begin at 10 a.m., began late as witnesses,
residents and legal officials waited for Stephen Eisdorfer to arrive.
The site plans being
reviewed during the two-day hearing involve the construction of 360 apartment
units at 215-235 Birchwood Ave. - a section of town prone to significant
flooding. The entire area was submerged in several feet of water following
Hurricane Irene last year. The proposal, which also calls for a five-story
parking garage, will include 60 affordable housing units.
For more than a year,
residents and officials have been voicing strong opposition to the Birchwood
Avenue housing plan. The township has been fighting to appeal Judge Lisa
Chrystal's July, 2011 decision in a builder's remedy lawsuit to allow CDA to
build on the 16-acre
tract of land.
During the hearing, the
architect who designed the building testified, giving specific information
about the proposed project. The plans call for two building that will be
55-feet tall and have a combined total of 668 available parking spaces. The
first building, Building A, will house 300 apartment units while Building B
will consist of 60 units. The developer has yet to determine which of the
apartments will be designated for affordable housing. McKenzie, during her
questioning, indicated that the designation must be made as part of the
official site plan approval. Plans also call for an "open" parking
garage and a surface lot.
When questioning the
architect, Morin asked questions about the plan's compliance with fire code as
well as lines on the proposal marked as "flood line" and a
"flood fringe line." The buildings, according to the plan, will be
constructed next to these lines, which, the architect said, is permissible.
During public questioning,
resident Thomas Hannen Jr. asked about the architect's design for an "open
garage" which is designed to be built one foot above the flood fringe.
Hannen asked whether or not the design took into consideration how the
structure would handle rising flood waters in the event of another significant
rainstorm. The architect indicated that the plans adhere to all building codes,
but no special provisions were made to allow water to flow out of the garage if
The second witness to
testify on Wednesday was traffic expert Elizabeth Dolan of the firm of Dolan
and Dean. Dolan explained that her firm conducted two surveys of the
intersection of Birchwood at Orange Avenue. One was conducted last July when
school was not in session, and other this past June, before the school year
ended. According to the traffic impact study, the level of traffic on Birchwood
Avenue if the proposed 360 apartment units are constructed will be
"acceptable" despite anticipated delays. She added that the traffic
impact study also shows that the delays that would arise are not severe enough
to warrant the installation of a new traffic signal at the intersection of
Orange and Birchwood avenues. Drivers in that area could face delays of nearly
one additional minute if the apartments are built.
The two intersections
Dolan's firm included in the traffic study were Birchwood Avenue and Orange
Avenue and at Cranford Avenue. As Cranford Avenue is not a through street,
Morin - and a few residents - asked why the next intersection - Bloomingdale
Avenue - was not included in the study. Dolan said the study was limited to the
two "adjacent intersections."
"I guess we could have
(included Bloomingdale Avenue)," she testified.
Morin stated that since
Cranford Avenue is not a through street and Bloomingdale Avenue is a main
thoroughfare and home to a school, failure to include it in the study does not
present a "true representation" of what the traffic impavt in the
area will be like if the Birchwood property is developed.
In response to concerns by
Morin and residents regarding the Bloomingdale Avenue intersection, Special
Master Wolfson said that since no one has raised the issue of that intersection
before Wednesday's hearing, the argument ill "have little weight"
when it comes to making a decision on the site plan.
The second day of the
hearing was scheduled for today.