Birchwood Developer Files Challenge to DEP Requirement
By DELL SIMEONE Specially Written for The Westfield Leader and The Times
Thursday, July 26, 2012
When the meeting opened up again, Mayor David
Robinson announced that matters pertaining to the repair of the lower
portion of the municipal building would be addressed at a another
special meeting to be held Monday, August 1, at 7:30 p.m., at the
municipal building.
Township Attorney Philip Morin announced that at 5 p.m. on
Monday, the township was notified of a motion before the court by the
Cranford Development Associates, (CDA) of the S. Hekemian Group of
Paramus, the company that wishes to develop the Birchwood project, a
360-apartment unit complex with 60 affordable to be built at 215
Birchwood Avenue along with a five-story parking garage,
challenging a requirement by the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection (DEP) that they are deficient in not having
a second road with access to the Birchwood property. The DEP also
requires that CDA elevate the road a foot above the flood
plain.
CDA has filed a motion with state Superior Judge Lisa F.
Crystal to be heard on Friday, August 3, before the site plan review,
which is to take place on Wednesday and Thursday, August 8 and 9, at
10 a.m., before retired Superior Court Judge Douglas Wolfson at the
Union County Courthouse, 2 Broad Street, Elizabeth. Both the CDA and
the Cranford Township Committee have requested the hearing to be held
in Cranford. “
They’re looking for a motion on short notice in advance of
when the court would hear a motion,” Mr. Morin said. “A motion should
not be heard prior to the next hearing date. We believe this a DEP
matter and should not be before the court.”
The CDA is trying to make an end run around the DEP
authority. We’re going to object, and ask that this motion be
rescheduled to allow us time to respond,” Mr. Morin said.
The CDA sued the township using a builder’s remedy lawsuit,
by which it claims that Cranford has not met it’s quota for
affordable housing units, and is trying to prevent the CDA from
building apartments which would include affordable units. Judge
Crystal ruled in favor of the developer.
The township, on the other hand, is objecting to the
development because of the fear of more flooding caused by more
people and inadequate infrastructure to accommodate a 360-unit
apartment building on environmentally sensitive land. The township is
appealing Judge Chrystal’s decision.